The use of AI and ChatGPT in teaching synonyms to EFL students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62583/rseltl.v2i4.53Keywords:
artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, EFL students, synonym teaching, vocabulary acquisitionAbstract
The research is carried out to investigate the efficiency of artificial intelligence, particularly ChatGPT, in teaching synonyms for EFL students. In this sense, the study included 90 students divided into two groups, one is the experimental and the other is a control group. Exercises based on ChatGPT were applied for the former, whereas traditional methods were applied for the latter. In this study, it has been reported that the experimental group has shown significant improvement in vocabulary acquisition. Also, the instant feedback and personalised learning experiences with ChatGPT increased student engagement and motivation. It is a demonstration that the integration of AI tools into language education could facilitate effective and interactive learning opportunities as opposed to conventional approaches. However, combining the two—using AI along with human instruction in a balanced way—is recommended for obtaining maximal educational outcomes and curbing the negative ethical concerns arising from the use of AI in education. This study also provides more support for the use of AI in improving language learning and suggests that additional research can be conducted on this topic, such as integrating AI in an educational environment.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Chen Jia Min
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Research Studies in English Teaching and Learning (RSELTL) Journal adopts the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows for the free distribution and modification of the work, provided that the original author and source are credited. The CC BY 4.0 license is designed to promote the dissemination of scholarly work while protecting the rights of authors.
Author Rights
Under the CC BY 4.0 license, authors retain extensive rights to their work, including but not limited to:
-
Ownership of Copyright: Authors maintain copyright ownership of their work, permitting them to deposit their work in institutional repositories, share their work as they deem appropriate, and publish their work elsewhere, provided that the original publication in RSELTL Journal is properly cited.
-
Use and Distribution: Authors are entitled to unlimited use and distribution of their own work for educational and scholarly purposes, as long as the original work is properly cited.
-
Adaptation and Derivatives: Authors have the right to adapt, modify, or create derivatives of their work, provided that the original work is properly cited, and the modifications do not misrepresent the original work.
User Rights
In accordance with the CC BY 4.0 license, users (readers, scholars, and researchers) are granted the following rights:
-
Access and Distribution: Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles published in RSELTL Journal without seeking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the original work and authorship are properly cited.
-
Creation of Derivative Works: Users may adapt or create derivative works from the RSELTL Journal articles, provided that the original work is properly cited, and the derivative work is distributed under the same CC BY 4.0 license.
Responsibilities and Restrictions
-
Attribution: Proper attribution must be given to the original author(s) and the RSELTL Journal, including provision of a link to the original work and indication if any changes were made.
-
No Additional Restrictions: Users must not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
-
Commercial Use: The CC BY 4.0 license permits commercial use of the works, as long as the original work and authorship are properly cited.