The Influence of Social Media on English Language Acquisition: A Quantitative Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper tries to discuss and explore the complex influences and impacts that social media have on the acquisition of the English language, using an integrated quantitatively analytical approach. The work uses an online survey of 500 social media users involved in learning English. It has unveiled highly important insights about the way social media platforms are helping the learning of the language, in particular the aspect of vocabulary and reading ability. Such findings clearly bring out the promising role of social media in providing authentic language-using context and fostering peer interaction. The major concern is the informal language—or rather the abbreviations that spur on poor writing and can be detrimental to the culture of formal writing. The present study highlighted the double-edged role of social media, the very valuable tool for language exposure and practice on the one side and the area that has to be critically navigated, negotiated, and decreased its less-favourable impact on language learning on the other side. This really represents a delicate balance both educators and learners have to strike, hence a strategic perspective on the use of social media in language education with an aim to exploit to the maximum use of the learning tool while at the same time managing its inherent disadvantages.
Downloads
Article Details
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Research Studies in English Teaching and Learning (RSELTL) Journal adopts the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows for the free distribution and modification of the work, provided that the original author and source are credited. The CC BY 4.0 license is designed to promote the dissemination of scholarly work while protecting the rights of authors.
Author Rights
Under the CC BY 4.0 license, authors retain extensive rights to their work, including but not limited to:
-
Ownership of Copyright: Authors maintain copyright ownership of their work, permitting them to deposit their work in institutional repositories, share their work as they deem appropriate, and publish their work elsewhere, provided that the original publication in RSELTL Journal is properly cited.
-
Use and Distribution: Authors are entitled to unlimited use and distribution of their own work for educational and scholarly purposes, as long as the original work is properly cited.
-
Adaptation and Derivatives: Authors have the right to adapt, modify, or create derivatives of their work, provided that the original work is properly cited, and the modifications do not misrepresent the original work.
User Rights
In accordance with the CC BY 4.0 license, users (readers, scholars, and researchers) are granted the following rights:
-
Access and Distribution: Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles published in RSELTL Journal without seeking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the original work and authorship are properly cited.
-
Creation of Derivative Works: Users may adapt or create derivative works from the RSELTL Journal articles, provided that the original work is properly cited, and the derivative work is distributed under the same CC BY 4.0 license.
Responsibilities and Restrictions
-
Attribution: Proper attribution must be given to the original author(s) and the RSELTL Journal, including provision of a link to the original work and indication if any changes were made.
-
No Additional Restrictions: Users must not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
-
Commercial Use: The CC BY 4.0 license permits commercial use of the works, as long as the original work and authorship are properly cited.