Investigating the effectiveness of inquiry-based learning (IBL) on students’ academic achievement
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigates the effectiveness of IBL on students’ academic achievement within an undergraduate education context. A quasi-experimental, pre-test–post-test control group design was employed, involving 60 second-year students assigned to either an IBL-based instruction group or a traditional lecture-based instruction group. Academic achievement was measured using a validated multiple-choice test aligned with the course objectives. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) results indicated that the students who were exposed to inquiry instruction performed significantly better than the students of the traditional instruction group with a very large effect size, though these results need to be interpreted cautiously due to unusually high values obtained. Furthermore, prior academic achievement emerged as a strong predictor of post-test performance. These findings highlight the considerable potential of inquiry-based learning to advance academic outcomes and reinforce the importance of initial learner preparedness. The study concludes by recommending broader adoption of structured inquiry models, such as the 5E learning cycle, while calling for future research to explore long-term effects and individual learner differences.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Research Studies in English Teaching and Learning (RSELTL) Journal adopts the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows for the free distribution and modification of the work, provided that the original author and source are credited. The CC BY 4.0 license is designed to promote the dissemination of scholarly work while protecting the rights of authors.
Author Rights
Under the CC BY 4.0 license, authors retain extensive rights to their work, including but not limited to:
-
Ownership of Copyright: Authors maintain copyright ownership of their work, permitting them to deposit their work in institutional repositories, share their work as they deem appropriate, and publish their work elsewhere, provided that the original publication in RSELTL Journal is properly cited.
-
Use and Distribution: Authors are entitled to unlimited use and distribution of their own work for educational and scholarly purposes, as long as the original work is properly cited.
-
Adaptation and Derivatives: Authors have the right to adapt, modify, or create derivatives of their work, provided that the original work is properly cited, and the modifications do not misrepresent the original work.
User Rights
In accordance with the CC BY 4.0 license, users (readers, scholars, and researchers) are granted the following rights:
-
Access and Distribution: Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles published in RSELTL Journal without seeking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the original work and authorship are properly cited.
-
Creation of Derivative Works: Users may adapt or create derivative works from the RSELTL Journal articles, provided that the original work is properly cited, and the derivative work is distributed under the same CC BY 4.0 license.
Responsibilities and Restrictions
-
Attribution: Proper attribution must be given to the original author(s) and the RSELTL Journal, including provision of a link to the original work and indication if any changes were made.
-
No Additional Restrictions: Users must not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
-
Commercial Use: The CC BY 4.0 license permits commercial use of the works, as long as the original work and authorship are properly cited.