Digital versus Traditional Reading Materials in English Language Learning: A Comparative Analysis of Student Perceptions and Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62583/rseltl.v2i2.40Keywords:
e-learning, academic performance, student engagement, educational technology, digital readingAbstract
The current study will reveal students' attitudes towards and views of the use of digital or traditional reading materials in English language courses. The study, therefore, uses a quantitative survey design in the research, exploring how students use digital materials compared to the conventional type and their perceptions of the amount of influence it has on improving their level of engagement as well as academic performance. The study aims to contribute to the broader discourse on educational digitalization. Limitations of the study included the relatively small sample size and the use of self-reported data, which would require further investigation with a more varied and larger number of cohorts. The implication of such findings is, therefore, very strong on the preference of students for digital reading materials, alluding to the importance associated with digital resources in enhancing educational engagement and the academic outcomes of the current digital learning environment.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jaloliddin Akbarov, Feruza Alimova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Research Studies in English Teaching and Learning (RSELTL) Journal adopts the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows for the free distribution and modification of the work, provided that the original author and source are credited. The CC BY 4.0 license is designed to promote the dissemination of scholarly work while protecting the rights of authors.
Author Rights
Under the CC BY 4.0 license, authors retain extensive rights to their work, including but not limited to:
-
Ownership of Copyright: Authors maintain copyright ownership of their work, permitting them to deposit their work in institutional repositories, share their work as they deem appropriate, and publish their work elsewhere, provided that the original publication in RSELTL Journal is properly cited.
-
Use and Distribution: Authors are entitled to unlimited use and distribution of their own work for educational and scholarly purposes, as long as the original work is properly cited.
-
Adaptation and Derivatives: Authors have the right to adapt, modify, or create derivatives of their work, provided that the original work is properly cited, and the modifications do not misrepresent the original work.
User Rights
In accordance with the CC BY 4.0 license, users (readers, scholars, and researchers) are granted the following rights:
-
Access and Distribution: Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles published in RSELTL Journal without seeking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the original work and authorship are properly cited.
-
Creation of Derivative Works: Users may adapt or create derivative works from the RSELTL Journal articles, provided that the original work is properly cited, and the derivative work is distributed under the same CC BY 4.0 license.
Responsibilities and Restrictions
-
Attribution: Proper attribution must be given to the original author(s) and the RSELTL Journal, including provision of a link to the original work and indication if any changes were made.
-
No Additional Restrictions: Users must not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
-
Commercial Use: The CC BY 4.0 license permits commercial use of the works, as long as the original work and authorship are properly cited.
